Fraudulent Vitamin D Research (Murai, JAMA 2021) Designed to Fail, Misinform, and Redirect Money and Attention
They tried to make vitamin D appear ineffective against the targeted viral infection so that people would be forced into fear, obedience, drugs, and injections — all of which benefit Big Medicine
Citation:
Murai et al. Effect of a Single High Dose of Vitamin D3 on Hospital Length of Stay in Patients with Moderate to Severe Cxxxx19. JAMA—Journal of the American Medical Association February 17, 2021 10.1001/jama.2020.26848
What they tried to do by using this bogus research design:
They tried to make vitamin D appear ineffective against the targeted viral infection so that people would be forced into fear, obedience, drugs, and injections — all of which benefit the profits of the medical industry.
What they falsely concluded, what was reported to millions of people via the mass media, and what the government policymakers were told:
That “Vitamin D doesn’t work”, which is absurd because 1) of course vitamin D supports many functions in the human body, and because 2) nothing “works” when it is used/applied incorrectly.
Implications of this fraud:
People were further forced into fear, obedience, drugs, and injections — all of which benefit the profits of the medical industry.
How can we be sure that this is fraud?
THEY INTENTIONALLY DELAYED TREATMENT: Because they waited roughly 11 days before starting treatment, and we know that these patients need treatment within the first 3 days for any treatment to be effective. ZERO POSSIBILITY THAT THIS WAS AN INNOCENT MISTAKE; ZERO POSSIBILITY THAT ANY COMPETENT DOCTOR OR EDITOR WOULD THINK THAT THIS IS REASONABLE OR CONSISTENT WITH ANY “STANDARD OF CARE.”
THEY INTENTIONALLY USED MASSIVE BOLUS DOSING WHICH IS WITHOUT BENEFIT AND IS KNOWN TO BE HARMFUL: We have known this for decades and it was reviewed in the British Medical Journal in 2017 so of course these authors would have known about it. ZERO POSSIBILITY THAT THIS WAS AN INNOCENT MISTAKE BECAUSE THE AUTHORS READ AND CITED THE EXACT PAPER THAT ALREADY PROVED THAT THEIR MASSIVE-BOLUS DOSING WAS INEFFECTIVE.
INCONSISTENCY: Their two study groups were not equally matched; this is used as grounds to retract research when that research shows benefit of nutritional supplementation but such problems are overlooked when the research is being used to slander/disparage nondrug/noninjection treatments.
What should happen to make things correct:
The article should be withdrawn/retracted by the journal.
JAMA and AMA should publicize (eg, send out press releases) stating that this was bogus research and explaining why it is bogus so that the general public understands.
The Editors and Reviewers at the journal should be disciplined.
AMA needs to review its Editor/Editorial processes and make repairs.
AMA could use its multimillion-dollar funding to conduct legitimate research.
My complete reviews of this scandal:
PDF, originally posted: academia.edu/45159442
Dr Alex Vasquez 2021 Call For Retraction Preprint Infographic Jama Bogusvitamindstudycovid Download
Video reviews—posted below:
SEMI-CASUAL VIDEO REVIEW: Effect of a Single High Dose of Vitamin D3 on Hospital Length of Stay in Patients With Moderate to Severe [Con Vid] JAMA 2021
VIDEO REVIEW + PDF: Vitamin D Pharmacology
Vasquez 2020 Ijhnfm Vitamindogmadosingdoneft Download
